Knowledgeable: Grand Rapids officer ‘didn’t have affordable concern for his life’ when he killed Lyoya

Former Grand Rapids police officer Christopher Schurr violated his coaching and used pointless and extreme pressure when he shot and killed Patrick Lyoya, a 26-year-old unarmed Black man, at a time when the officer’s life was by no means in peril, regulation enforcement specialists mentioned in two new affidavits.
They have been submitted in a $100 million civil lawsuit the Lyoya household filed towards town of Grand Rapids and Schurr.
Throughout a press convention in Southfield on Monday, two distinguished civil rights attorneys representing the Lyoya household, Ben Crump and Ven Johnson, detailed the affidavits, which have been filed Friday in U.S. District Courtroom in Grand Rapids.
“What we noticed right here was not only a full refusal to observe Schurr’s personal coaching, however, extra importantly for us, this lethal pressure was pointless and unlawful and extreme,” Johnson mentioned on the press convention that was additionally attended by Patrick Lyoya’s father, Peter Lyoya. “… If any individual resists arrest, that doesn’t give an officer an absolute constitutional proper to make use of extreme lethal pressure.”
On April 4, 2022, Schurr, who’s white, shot the unarmed Lyoya behind the pinnacle throughout a site visitors cease that Crump mentioned was “merely a case of driving whereas Black” in a metropolis, state and nation the place Black people are much more possible to be pulled over and killed by police than white individuals.
Metropolis officers have mentioned Lyoya — a refugee from the Democratic Republic of Congo who lived in Kentwood and labored a manufacturing unit job in Grand Rapids — was pulled over due to a license plate violation. Schurr was fired from his job within the Grand Rapids Police Division after Kent County Prosecutor Christopher Becker charged Schurr with second-degree homicide in June; his legal trial is scheduled to start in October.
“Let’s name it what it’s: an execution,” mentioned Crump, who beforehand represented the households of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, two Black people killed by police. “A site visitors cease results in a demise sentence. …That is legal as a result of if they’ll shoot Patrick Lyoya behind the pinnacle and get away with it, what message does that ship to police departments across the nation?”
A spokesman for town of Grand Rapids, Steve Guitar, declined to remark due to the pending court docket case. Schurr’s attorneys from the Royal Oak-based Seward Henderson regulation agency didn’t reply to a request for remark.
The affidavits from Thomas Tiderington, a retired particular investigations division commander within the Fort Lauderdale Police Division, and W. Ken Katsaris, a licensed regulation enforcement officer in Florida, have been submitted after Schurr’s attorneys in February filed a movement to dismiss the case due to certified immunity.
A authorized precept that applies solely in civil instances, certified immunity protects authorities officers, together with police, from civil legal responsibility for actions they took whereas on the job. Critics of certified immunity, together with Johnson and Crump, say the process has protected cops accused of deadly shootings and extreme use of pressure.
“They all the time say, ‘I needed to kill him as a result of I feared for my life,’” Crump mentioned of police. “They mentioned it with Patrick Lyoya; they tried to say it with George Floyd; they tried to say it with Tyre Nichols. …This certified immunity permits cops to kill Black individuals with impunity.”
In Could 2020, a white Minneapolis police officer murdered George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, in a criminal offense that was caught on video and sparked worldwide protests towards police brutality. Nichols, a 29-year-old Black man, died in January after being crushed by Memphis police.
Tiderington and Katsaris, regulation enforcement specialists who Johnson and Crump famous sometimes testify in favor of police, detailed of their affidavits a number of methods they consider Schurr violated police coaching and protocol. These embody the officer pulling Lyoya over with out warranted cause, improperly utilizing his Taser by not offering sufficient distance between the officer and Lyoya, not asserting he was going to make use of his Taser, preventing with Lyoya for the Taser after it had deployed two cartridges — which means the weapon was unable to incapacitate the officer — and, finally, capturing Lyoya when Schurr’s life was not in peril.
Video from the Schurr’s body-worn digicam, an in-car digicam, a house surveillance system and a cellphone recording pieced collectively the ultimate moments of Lyoya’s life, which included Schurr, who was patrolling alone, chasing Lyoya after a frightened Lyoya ran from the officer, utilizing a Taser on Lyoya twice, pinning Lyoya to the bottom, and, as confirmed by an unbiased post-mortem, capturing Lyoya behind the pinnacle.

“Had Schurr adopted correct protocols, Lyoya extra possible than not can be alive at the moment,” Tiderington wrote in his affidavit. “A fairly prudent officer in Schurr’s place would know that capturing Lyoya behind the pinnacle whereas he was on the bottom face down violated Lyoya’s clearly established proper to be free from extreme pressure.”
Tiderington continued to say that, “from the proof produced, I don’t see any indication that Lyoya took the Taser from Schurr and even gained practical management of the machine. For my part, Schurr voluntarily relinquished management of the Taser, selecting to regular himself on prime of Lyoya, who was confronted down, unholster his firearm, and hearth one shot into the again of Lyoya’s head with none verbal warning.”
When Schurr shot Lyoya, the officer “didn’t have an affordable concern for his life,” Tiderington wrote.
“Schurr is entitled to certified immunity as a result of the movies exhibit that Plaintiff can not plead a constitutional violation nor a violation of clearly established regulation,” the movement reads partially, referencing physique digicam, dashboard digicam, residence surveillance and cellphone video that present the capturing.
Katsaris echoed these sentiments.
“It’s my opinion that Schurr was much less all in favour of correctly utilizing his department-issued instruments as he was educated to do and extra all in favour of having fixed bodily contact with Lyoya,” Katsaris wrote. “When Schurr took Lyoya to the bottom, he negated any potential weight benefit Lyoya might have had by straddling Lyoya, who was inclined, as a result of Schurr had the flexibility to extricate himself, create distance and obstacles, draw his weapon, and verbally command Lyoya to cease resisting.”
At any level through the interplay, Schurr may have positioned bodily distance between himself and Lyoya and waited for the police backup that was about to reach, the specialists mentioned. However, the specialists mentioned, Schurr by no means did that.
“There’s no constitutional proper to execute a Black man behind the mind for merely making an attempt to get away from you,” Crump mentioned.
All through the press convention, Peter Lyoya quietly sat as he listened to the phrases describing his son’s demise. Then, by way of a household pastor and interpreter, Israel Siku, he spoke of the deep effectively of ache and trauma he and his household have confronted over the previous 12 months.
“Feb. 5 was his birthday,” Peter Lyoya mentioned of Patrick. “… When it got here to Feb. 5, it was so painful to us.”
A pair months later, on the one-year anniversary of Patrick Lyoya’s demise, “we went to the tomb, to the cemetery,” Peter Lyoya mentioned. “We harm.”
Now, Peter Lyoya mentioned, he and his household are ready for some semblance of justice.
“They hold pushing the [criminal] case: March, June, October — all of it is because they need the individuals to overlook how Patrick was killed, how my son was shot behind the pinnacle,” he mentioned.
“If there’s justice on this nation, then we’re asking for justice for Patrick,” he continued.

For Crump, Johnson and former Kent County Commissioner Robert Womack — who attended Monday’s press convention and has lengthy criticized racist and lethal policing — Lyoya’s demise shouldn’t solely lead to penalties for the officer and Grand Rapids however ought to encourage much-needed change in a metropolis, and nation, reckoning with an extended historical past of police brutality.
“These are conversations occurring in barber retailers and church buildings,” Womack mentioned, referring to racist policing.
Calling out police brutality could be “political suicide,” Womack continued — however, he mentioned, it’s essential to “get up so the kids of tomorrow, each Black and white, of all colours, have Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream that we’re strolling hand-in-hand.”
Crump famous that April 4 is each the day Patrick Lyoya died and when Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968.
“Individuals might ask why we hold drawing consideration to the actual fact this was an unarmed Black man shot behind his mind for a easy site visitors cease,” Crump mentioned. “We by no means see movies of the police capturing a white particular person behind the mind for a site visitors cease. If it’s not acceptable for police to do this to white individuals, why would we justify it once they do it to Black individuals? This occurred on April 4, the identical day Martin Luther King was assassinated.
“It begs the query: How a lot progress have we made in the USA of America?”
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX