Years from now, when Chicagoans stroll the Lake Michigan waterfront, they might see the blades of wind generators glinting on the horizon. Clevelanders may glimpse wind farms over Lake Erie. And cities like Milwaukee and Buffalo may very well be vying to draw a burgeoning offshore wind business on the Nice Lakes.
That’s the imaginative and prescient some regional leaders have for America’s Third Coast. They see the Midwest’s freshwater seas as 94,000 sq. miles of untapped potential, boasting persistently sturdy winds in a area that’s already dwelling to a longtime manufacturing sector.
Lawmakers in Illinois and Pennsylvania are contemplating payments this 12 months to advertise offshore wind improvement within the waters off their coasts. In Ohio, a long-debated challenge to put in six generators on Lake Erie has had its permits upheld by the state Supreme Courtroom, clearing the way in which for the nation’s first freshwater wind farm.
“This area typically will get missed as an space that is sort of a coastal space,” mentioned Carlos Ochoa, ocean program supervisor with the Nationwide Caucus of Environmental Legislators, a discussion board for state lawmakers. “You’re seeing legislative motion in Nice Lakes states the place offshore wind wasn’t a lot of a consideration years in the past.”
However the lakes additionally pose distinctive challenges, together with winter ice cowl, inadequate port and transport infrastructure, and communities that worth the coastlines for his or her pure magnificence.
That’s why different areas have moved extra shortly. Offshore wind tasks are burgeoning on the Atlantic coast, the place states have spent years crafting utility necessities and investing in ports and infrastructure. On the Pacific Ocean, states hope new applied sciences may unlock wind potential in deeper waters.
The Biden administration has dedicated to reaching 30 gigawatts of offshore wind capability by 2030, sufficient to energy greater than 10 million houses. Some leaders suppose it’s time for the Nice Lakes to be a part of that blend.
The American facet of the lakes is bordered by Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Every state controls the waters off its coast, extending to the center of the lake the place it reaches a border with the state or Canadian province on the other shore.
Lots of these states nonetheless rely closely on coal and pure fuel to produce their electrical energy; the eight states bordering the lakes produce 1 / 4 of the nation’s greenhouse fuel emissions, in accordance with the federal Vitality Data Administration.
In the meantime, in accordance with one federal estimate, the Nice Lakes characterize one-fifth of the nation’s offshore wind potential.
For all that potential, some critics liken placing wind farms on the Nice Lakes to filling the Grand Canyon with photo voltaic panels.
“Should you’re from Cleveland, Lake Erie is your nationwide park,” mentioned John Lipaj, a board member with the Lake Erie Basis, an Ohio-based advocacy nonprofit. “I can consider only a few people who wish to see Lake Erie flip into an industrial wind facility.”
Others, although, suppose generators on the horizon may very well be some extent of pleasure, particularly if Nice Lakes wind can flip the Rust Belt right into a clear power hub.
“Some individuals will take a look at that as a visual indicator that we’re doing large issues to battle local weather change,” mentioned Jack Darin, director of the Sierra Membership’s Illinois chapter.
‘Seems like the longer term’
Earlier this 12 months, the Illinois Home superior a invoice that may direct the state to pursue a pilot challenge on Lake Michigan, aimed toward bringing 150 megawatts of energy on-line by 2030. Offshore wind specialists say it’s the strongest measure any Nice Lakes state has thought-about to advertise such improvement.
The proposal additionally would create a fund that may allow the state to compete for federal infrastructure cash, whereas establishing fairness necessities to make sure that workforce and financial alternatives are directed to marginalized communities.
“That is novel and thrilling and actually looks like the longer term,” mentioned state Rep. Ann Williams, a Democrat who chairs the Vitality and Setting Committee. “There’s a whole lot of untapped potential offshore.”
The invoice has not but superior within the Senate, however Williams expressed optimism that it will ultimately move.
Michigan hasn’t closed the door on this eternally, however (value concern) places it down the highway a bit. The breakthrough will include the floating turbine expertise. At that time, will the state of Michigan bounce in there and take a look at incentives? I feel it’s doable.
– James Clift, deputy director with the Michigan Division of Setting, Nice Lakes and Vitality
Some environmental and labor organizations assist the proposal. However at the least one group has raised considerations that leasing wind areas to builders would violate the doctrine that the lakes are to be held in belief by the states for public use.
Darin, with the Sierra Membership, famous that Illinois sees stronger winds over Lake Michigan than on land. Offshore wind farms additionally will be constructed nearer to the state’s largest electrical energy customers within the Chicago area.
“There’s way more capability on the market over the lake if we study from this pilot that it may be executed safely and successfully,” he mentioned.
In the meantime, Pennsylvania lawmakers are contemplating a invoice that may set up a lease and royalty system for offshore wind amenities. State Rep. Bob Merski, the invoice’s Democratic sponsor, didn’t reply to a request for remark.
The invoice has but to be heard in committee.
Not there but
Whereas some state leaders push to get generators within the water, others imagine such discussions are untimely. Michigan has no express prohibition on offshore wind, however procurement of electrical energy within the state goes by means of a aggressive bid course of. With out vital state incentives, offshore wind merely can’t compete on value, mentioned James Clift, deputy director with the Michigan Division of Setting, Nice Lakes and Vitality.
He mentioned the state nonetheless has a lot room to develop wind and photo voltaic farms on land, and state leaders are assured Michigan can transition to wash electrical energy even when offshore wind doesn’t grow to be viable.
Clift mentioned generators situated in nearshore waters additionally may create conflicts with recreation and tourism, key points of Michigan’s identification. Finding wind farms in deeper waters away from the coast would require floating generators, that are presently being developed for areas off Maine and the Pacific coast.
“Michigan hasn’t closed the door on this eternally, however [cost concern] places it down the highway a bit,” he mentioned. “The breakthrough will include the floating turbine expertise. At that time, will the state of Michigan bounce in there and take a look at incentives? I feel it’s doable.”
An evaluation revealed earlier this 12 months by the federal Nationwide Renewable Vitality Laboratory discovered that Michigan had way more potential than every other state to supply energy from Nice Lakes wind — an quantity many instances higher than its annual electrical energy consumption. However tapping into that wind, for any state, will include challenges.
Walt Musial, principal engineer with the laboratory, mentioned the lakes don’t but have ports or ships that may assist deployment of offshore wind. Generators additionally must be designed to resist the lakes’ ice cowl within the winter.
“The query isn’t just is it a good suggestion, however is it wanted?” he mentioned. “It actually looks like there’s going to be a problem [for Great Lakes states] to satisfy all of the decarbonization necessities with simply the land-based assets which might be out there. There’s sufficient useful resource on the market within the lakes to make a major contribution on this regard.”
Nonetheless, he mentioned, offshore wind within the lakes is a good distance from being commercially viable.
The federal evaluation produced by Musial and others discovered that New York had the third-most potential to generate energy on the lakes. The state has invested closely in creating wind energy on the Atlantic Ocean, and officers lately spent 18 months exploring the feasibility of putting generators on Lake Erie and Lake Ontario. However the New York State Vitality Analysis and Improvement Authority concluded that the state ought to hit pause on these ambitions.
“At current, Nice Lakes wind doesn’t provide a singular, vital, or cost-effective contribution towards the achievement of New York’s Local weather Act objectives,” the company mentioned in a press release summarizing its conclusions.
Ohio may go first
The primary take a look at case for offshore wind within the lakes is the Icebreaker Wind challenge in Ohio, a six-turbine pilot challenge deliberate in Lake Erie off the coast of Cleveland. Final 12 months, the Ohio Supreme Courtroom dominated that state regulators adopted the regulation in granting the challenge’s allow. Backers at the moment are working to line up capital and discover a purchaser for the wind farm’s energy.
“We’ve got the authorized points all out of the way in which to get the windmills into the water, it’s simply going to be a matter of how briskly we will transfer on the enterprise facet,” mentioned Jade Davis, senior vp of exterior affairs for the Port of Cleveland, which has labored intently with the event company main the challenge.
Davis mentioned offshore wind has the potential to revitalize manufacturing within the area. Early tasks like Icebreaker may assist set up the availability chains and workforce that can convey prices down for future tasks, he mentioned.
However the plan has additionally garnered opposition. Lipaj, with the Lake Erie Basis, accused backers of inflating the job estimates that Icebreaker Wind will create. These supporters, he mentioned, have touted electrical energy projections that may require an enormous buildout of wind farms past the preliminary six generators.
“There’s a whole lot of opposition from the general public for constructing 1,500 wind generators in Lake Erie,” he mentioned. “And [six turbines] isn’t going to do something for the setting.”
Some teams have tried to cease the challenge for concern it may hurt migratory birds, which was one of many fundamental authorized challenges within the lawsuit threatening the allow. However different environmental teams say offshore wind presents fewer ecological dangers than onshore renewable improvement.
“There’s a lot potential house and alternative introduced in accountable improvement of offshore wind,” mentioned Nolan Rutschilling, managing director of power coverage with the nonprofit Ohio Environmental Council. “You may actually make the most of the pure setting in a means that’s not intrusive or dangerous to the lakes or wildlife.”
Stateline is a part of States Newsroom, a community of stories bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott Greenberger for questions: [email protected] Comply with Stateline on Fb and Twitter.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX